What Would You Do If a Fracking Well Was Built In Your Yard?
London, England – England’s Department for Energy and Climate Change has been canvassing public views on plans to change access rights for oil and gas exploration up until this past Friday. Greenpeace says that under the government proposals, energy firms would be allowed to drill fracking wells under private land and homes without having to obtain permission from the owners.
But a Greenpeace UK analysis of the consultation papers found a major flaw in the description of the very legislation ministers are seeking to change.
Under the current system, homeowners can refuse consent to companies seeking to drill under their property. The courts can be asked to overrule the refusal, and the judge has to weigh up two separate arguments in making a decision, such as whether the development is in the national interest and whether the landowner has reasonable grounds to refuse permission.
Greenpeace claims that the government consultation completely failed to mention the ‘reasonable grounds’ argument, giving the misleading impression that courts can decide on the basis of national interest alone.
Greenpeace UK’s legal team first raised the issue with the energy department in a letter sent in June. In their response at the end of July, government officials partly acknowledged the issue and said they had clarified it on their website.
Greenpeace lawyers have written back to the energy secretary asking for the consultation to be scrapped. They point out the correction came just three weeks before the end of the consultation period, it doesn’t extend to all relevant documents, and no notice of it has been given to those who have already submitted their comments. The three-month consultation is due to closed Friday.
In their letter Greenpeace stresses the fact that ‘the defect in the consultation […] is far from technical’ as it would ‘lead consultees to think that what is being proposed is a minor change in the law when in fact it is a very significant one.’
According to Greenpeace, the lawyers also argue that the censored study into the social, environmental, and health-related impacts of fracking should have been made available to the public before the launch of the consultation in May. Instead, a heavily blacked-out version was published only last week following a request by Greenpeace under the Environmental Information Regulations.
The government launched the consultation at the end of May, just days before new legislation on fracking was announced in the Queen’s Speech. The changes would weaken trespass laws, allowing energy companies to drill under people’s homes without their permission.
A YouGov survey for Greenpeace published in June showed three quarters (74%) of people in Britain oppose the proposed changes to trespass law.
Greenpeace UK energy campaigner Louise Hutchins said, “This consultation has failed the basic requirement of being straightforward and transparent with the public. If ministers don’t discard this bungled process and start a fairer one, they’ll lay themselves open to potential legal challenges. This is too important an issue to let the government get away with a dismissive attitude towards people’s views – we’re keeping all our options open in challenging this reckless dash to frack.”